As a result, Investor B would pay $60,000 (net amount) to Investor A, while Investor A would have nothing to pay Investor B. This is an example of payment settlement or clearing. It is important to note that if the currencies in our example were different, such a type of compensation would not be used. Bilateral clearing occurs when two parties are involved. If there are more than two parties, this is called multilateral compensation. Where multilateral clearing takes place, the parties shall use a clearing house or central exchange to regulate the transactions and effects of the clearing. Some companies with multiple subsidiaries may also use multilateral clearing to offset payments received and owed to their various departments. The need for credit clearing stems from the fact that financial institutions are often required to conduct credit checks on their customers before approving certain transactions. Reviewing the borrowing party`s loan reduces the counterparty risk or the risk that the counterparty or borrowing party defaults on the loan. It is common for funding documentation to include a “material adverse change” or “material adverse effect” that no such change has occurred since a certain date.

For transactions in the lower midfield, the appearance of a significant adverse change can also be an immediate failure. Promoters and their portfolio companies should review the definition of material adverse changes with respect to the inclusion of “outlook” or other forward-looking terms that may allow a lender to determine that a default has occurred as a result of an adverse event that may occur in the future. If such forward-looking wording is included in a loan agreement, promoters and their portfolio companies should consider requesting a change to limit adverse events to those that actually occurred, including exclusions related to COVID-19 and pandemics in general. Similarly, novation clearing is a form of credit clearing in which one or more related transactions are cancelled to create a new payment obligation. The new commitment would be based on the sum of all ongoing transactions. This allows counterparties to settle all their outstanding liabilities in the form of a single payment. Promoters and their portfolio companies must carefully weigh the value of an forbearance agreement against the costs involved. While it is of course useful for holding companies to have a contractual respite, the conditions demanded by the company`s lenders are sometimes not worth it. If there are likely to be other defaults that may prematurely end an forbearance period, or if a potential refinancing or change of control is imminent, a holding company may be better off living with a persistent default event overall without imposing additional restrictions or paying additional fees. Of course, this must be weighed against the risk that the portfolio company`s creditors may seek remedies under the loan documents, including lump sum cash from controlled accounts or another seizure of the company`s assets, and how this may affect the marketing of a sale or refinancing transaction. Many leverage-based financial covenants also make it possible to offset liquidity without the constraint of calculating a company`s debt, often up to a dollar ceiling. In line with the general approach of maintaining a sound cash buffer on the balance sheet, promoters and their portfolio companies should ensure that they make full use of cash compensation to reduce pressure on financial covenants by ensuring that cash is held in good corporate accounts where necessary to comply with financial covenants.

Promoters may also consider equity contributions to holding companies prior to the occurrence of financial covenant defaults, in some cases for cash clearing purposes. As long as the applicable credit agreement does not provide for the mandatory advance payment of loans with the proceeds of such capital contributions, such proceeds may also be used by the Company for operating and other expenses after review of the financial agreements. There are different types of networks or ways in which the network concept can be used. Below, we look at the four types of compensation: Offsetting is a method of reducing risk in financial contracts by combining or aggregating multiple financial obligations to obtain a net commitment amount. Clearing is used to reduce settlement, credit and other financial risks between two or more parties. A new point concerns issues relating to third parties and post-closure obligations. Most secured financing requires elements of third parties, such as. B access to collateral agreements, insurance endorsements and account control agreements, the timing of which is beyond the control of the lender and borrower. Many transactions also involve the obligation to obtain additional consents from third parties or to modify contracts with third parties within the agreed deadlines. The pandemic has caused delays with third parties, and lenders are generally not required to grant extensions or waivers. While these issues are often deprioritized, companies need to ensure that they do everything in their power to resolve them within the originally agreed timelines. .